-
https://presidentwilson.org/files/original/1c10ce1f067667aa6955e9626b2604fe.pdf
67697acdf6609541a1a9f3dfbec0bd91
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
World War I Letters
Subject
The topic of the resource
World War, 1914-1918
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Woodrow Wilson
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Library of Congress, Woodrow Wilson Papers, 1786-1957
Description
An account of the resource
Letters from the White House to various individuals
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Library of Congress
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Woodrow Wilson Presidential Library
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
3 file drawers of scanned copies, 1517 pdfs
Language
A language of the resource
English
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
papers, digital documents
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1917-1918
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
MS100001
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Numeric
Date
19180201
Text
Any textual data included in the document
<p>(copy)<br />C A B L E G R A M.</p>
<p>Received at War Department February 1, 1918.4:45 P.M.<br />2 CO Paris<br />The Adjutant General,Washington.<br />Confidential for the Secretary of War.</p>
<p>Number 16 January 30th.</p>
<p>Paragraph 1. The following is in further reference to your number 14 dated January 21st, received in London, and your number 16 dated January 23rd, received in Paris. Your number 14 stated that General Pershing had approved, under certain conditions, the supply to the British of 150 battalions of American Infantry to be transported by British shipping and to serve with the British at the rate of 3 battalions per division, but that this project was contingent upon the supply of tonnage to us from Great Britain to accomplish our agreed minimum military effort of 24 divisions in France by about middle of July. You further directed me to discuss the matter with General Pershing in Paris before taking final action. On January 22nd had conference with Sir Joseph Maclay, British Minister of Shipping. He stated that under no circumstances could Great Britain give us additional tonnage to carry out our 24 division program. I said that in that event I must ask additional instructions before making arrangements to carry out the plans to send 150 battalions to serve with the British. He then said that he would send his principal shipping expert with me to Paris to further discuss the matter with Captain Jacob M. Coward of my staff. After final discussion in Paris, British still declined to give us additional tonnage for our program. Meanwhile, General Pershing told me that he had not approved the plan of sending 150 American Infantry battalions to serve with the British. On further discussion General Robertson, British Chief of Staff, General Pershing and myself, it was proposed by General Pershing that the British bring over the personnel of 6 complete divisions instead of 150 Infantry battalions. This new proposition was telegraphed by General Robertson to Mr. Lloyd George in London, who replied asking an interview with General Pershing and myself yesterday January 29th. On that date the matter was discussed in conference by Mr. Lloyd George, Lord Milner, General Robertson, General Haig, General Pershing, and myself, without definite result. Today the British in a document signed by Mr. Lloyd George accepted our proposition to bring over 6 complete divisions instead of 150 battalions. General Pershing in his number 555 has informed you of the conditions. I recommend immediate approval as the arrangements must be made at once.</p>
<p>Paragraph 2. At today's session of the Supreme War Council, the question came up of utilizing American troops now in France as battalions and regiments in the French and English armies. It was unanimously stated by British, FRENCH and Italian representatives that this was the only possible way to utilize American troops in the campaigns of 1918, and that it was vitally necessary to meet the apprehended German attacks. At my request this question was postponed for a short time. British and French insist that this use of our troops is necessary to insure safety of defensive lines in France against growing German attacks. It is probably that Supreme War Council will make demands for this use of all American troops at its present session.</p>
<p>Paragraph 3. The British, French and Italian military representatives have the support of their Prime Ministers and of at least one member their political Cabinets. The American position on the Supreme War Council would be stronger if there were on the Supreme War Council political representation. Would it not be well to designate American Ambassadors at London and Paris as our political representatives, who could be reenforced from time to time by a delegate direct from the administration in Washington? If this is approved, I suggest that immediate action be taken.<br />BLISS.</p>
<p>Copy for:Secretary of War.</p>
Original Format
The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data
Letter
To
The name(s) and email address(es) of the person to whom the email was sent
Baker, Newton Diehl, 1871-1937
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1918 February 1
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
WWP22228
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Library of Congress, Woodrow Wilson Papers, 1786-1957
Title
A name given to the resource
Tasker Howard Bliss to Newton D. Baker
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Bliss, Tasker Howard, 1853-1930